Hi Doug,
At 22:38 15-07-2013, Doug Barton wrote:
Interesting, but pardon my being blunt, it does not seem to cover
any new ground. You did say one useful thing:
IETF specifications usually provide guidance to ensure
interoperability. Whether dotless domains are harmful or not is a
policy
What this brings to mind is that we used to have implicit DNS domain
search in the early days of DNS. When edu.com accidentally hijacked
a huge chunk of the Internet, most of the net very quickly got rid of
implicit search, and we got the explicit DNS search feature that many
people are
--On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:07 -0400 Ofer Inbar
c...@a.org wrote:
...
What this brings to mind is that we had a DNS system that was
vulnerable to the addition of something to the DNS that people
had expected nobody would make the mistake of doing, but it
happened and caused damage,
In message 20130716150721.gg29...@mip.a.org, Ofer Inbar writes:
What this brings to mind is that we used to have implicit DNS domain
search in the early days of DNS. When edu.com accidentally hijacked
a huge chunk of the Internet, most of the net very quickly got rid of
implicit
On 07/14/2013 10:05 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
At 06:53 14-07-2013, Yoav Nir wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-dotless-domains-00
That memo discusses about the case of the dotless domains in terms of
the technical standards. Comments are welcome.
Interesting, but pardon my
At 06:53 14-07-2013, Yoav Nir wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-dotless-domains-00
That memo discusses about the case of the dotless domains in terms of
the technical standards. Comments are welcome.
At 13:11 13-07-2013, Ofer Inbar wrote:
What this brings to mind
