quite clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to the
output of an RG.
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only
place I could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The mere
fact that the title of document is about "working" groups doesn&#x
> "Pete" == Pete Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pete> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4844.txt
Pete> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-rfcs-03.txt
Pete> We have (IMO) historically screwed up with regard to IRTF
Pete> and individual documents and not given them a proper str
On 11/7/08 at 9:38 AM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
It seems quite clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to
the output of an RG.
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only
place I could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The
Sam Hartman wrote:
> It seems quite clear to me that RFC 2418 does not apply at all to the
output of an RG.
Sam,
I've looked around and the WG Guidelines doc happens to be the only place I
could find that defines the purpose of a Last Call. The mere fact that the title
of doc
