Scott Bradner wrote:
I actually wonder if this is an issue for the IASA BCP document,
because it is about the Transition Team Transparency.
I do not think it is
So I propose to remobve it from the iasa-bcp queue or declare it
as No change needed.
makes sense to me
Agreed
Brian
AS recorded at: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=719
I actually wonder if this is an issue for the IASA BCP document,
because it is about the Transition Team Transparency.
So I propose to remobve it from the iasa-bcp queue or declare it
as No change needed.
Bert
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 11:44:01 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence, and I
don't think that this is an onerous requirement. It is not likely that
there will be all that much non-electronic communication, such
Brian's response seems reasonable to me.
John
--- Original message ---
Subject: Re: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC
From: Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time: 12/08/2004 3:53 pm
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi All,
In reviewing the IASA BCP draft, I
the wording needs to be carefully done
Scott
-
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:00:43 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Bradner)
From: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Scott,
At 12:36 PM -0500 12/8/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
Actually
Hi All,
In reviewing the IASA BCP draft, I noticed that there are no specific
requirements regarding the level of transparency or openness expected
from the IAOC. IMO, we should be careful to start this activity with
a well-established understanding regarding the level of transparency
and
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi All,
In reviewing the IASA BCP draft, I noticed that there are no specific
requirements regarding the level of transparency or openness expected
from the IAOC. IMO, we should be careful to start this activity with a
well-established understanding regarding the
To respond to my own questions (not al lo fmy answers are 'yes'):
Do we expect the IAOC to keep minutes of their meetings and post
them publicly (unless there is a specific reason not to post a
certain section)? Specific reasons might include: personnel issue
and/or sensitive
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence
that would contract negotiations fun
Scott
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Most contract negotiations that I've been involved in have not
involved the exchange of snail mail or faxes until after the terms
are complete and the signatures are being exchanged.
Margaret
At 12:21 PM -0500 12/8/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence
Most contract negotiations that I've been involved in have not
involved the exchange of snail mail or faxes until after the terms
are complete and the signatures are being exchanged.
1/ I took all correspondence to mean all
Hi Scott,
At 12:36 PM -0500 12/8/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence
1/ I took all correspondence to mean all correspondence
But, when I said all correspondence, I didn't mean _all_
correspondence... :-)
Okay, so this obviously needs to be
:43 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Bradner)
From: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Scott,
At 12:36 PM -0500 12/8/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence
1/ I took all
* For instance, we were sent a budget that included a proposed RFC
* Editor cost of ~$800,000. This cost is based on a Statement of Work
* (SOW) that was negotiated between the IAB and the RFC Editor. Do we
* (the IETF community) have access to that SOW? (I don't actually know
*
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi All,
In reviewing the IASA BCP draft, I noticed that there are no specific
requirements regarding the level of transparency or openness expected
from the IAOC. IMO, we should be careful to start this activity with a
well-established understanding regarding the
The full SOW for 2004 is on the ISOC web site, at
www.isoc.org/standards/rfceditor/sow.shtml. A less detailed form is on
the RFC Editor web site, at www.rfc-editor.org/DOCUMENTS/purpose.html.
Thanks, Bob! I thought it was posted somewhere, but I couldn't find
it. Sorry.
Margaret
16 matches
Mail list logo
