On 1/25/2012 11:57 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> At 21:48 25-01-2012, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Why is Qian Sun still listed on the front page as an author. Wouldn't
>> it be more
>> appropriate to move the name to the Acknowledgements section where the
>> text
>> could read...
>
> As editorship is a
At 07:25 26-01-2012, Adrian Farrel wrote:
I have not made any statement about what the company has done.
Ok.
I don't view *disclosing* as a problem here. In fact disclosure is to be
encouraged.
I too don't view disclosing as a problem here. It is possible to
compare the statement with oth
> >Why is Qian Sun still listed on the front page as an author.
> >Wouldn't it be more
> >appropriate to move the name to the Acknowledgements section where the
> > text could read...
>
> As editorship is a WG Chair decision, it is up to the SIEVE WG Chairs
> to comment on why Qian Sun is still li
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:58 PM
> To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
> Cc: si...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Violation of IETF process (was: Second Last Call:
Hi Adrian,
At 21:48 25-01-2012, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Why is Qian Sun still listed on the front page as an author.
Wouldn't it be more
appropriate to move the name to the Acknowledgements section where the text
could read...
As editorship is a WG Chair decision, it is up to the SIEVE WG Chairs
f.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Violation of IETF process (was: Second Last Call:
sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism: SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed
> Standard)
>
> At 17:40 25-01-2012, Pete Resnick wrote:
> >Correct, except let's call it an "Internet Draft"
At 17:40 25-01-2012, Pete Resnick wrote:
Correct, except let's call it an "Internet Draft" for precision's sake.
What this thread is actually about is a violation of IETF process
(BCP) or IETF policy (Failure to comply with patent disclosure
requirements is a violation
