On Aug 31, 2013, at 12:10 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> announcement really ought to just point to the datatracker, since what's
>> there is normative.
>
> This is an individual opinion. Please assume that the entire IETF disagrees
> with it. The datatracker is not the authoritative version of a
SM,
> I assumed that the message was generated by the data tracker.
The secretariat sends out last call and WG review messages, but the data comes
from the tracker. For WGs, this is actually a relatively recent addition. A
while ago the proposed charters were not tracked in the database. In any
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:10:25PM -0700, S Moonesamy wrote:
> At 19:59 30-08-2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > announcement really ought to just point to the datatracker, since
> >what's there is normative.
>
> This is an individual opinion. Please assume that the entire IETF
> disagrees with it. The
Hi Ted,
At 19:59 30-08-2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
Yes. The minutes have been updated in the datatracker:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/charter/
Thanks.
I don't know why this didn't show up in the announcement
message. Actually, the
I assumed that the message was generated by the datat
On Aug 30, 2013, at 9:17 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Did the DHC working group read the milestones? I ask because it's been a few
> years since the year 2008 ended.
Yes. The minutes have been updated in the datatracker:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/charter/
I don't know why this didn't
Hello,
At 09:53 30-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
The Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) working group in the Internet Area
of the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made any
[snip]
Milestones:
Done - WG Last Call on DHCP Options for Internet Storage Name
Service (draft-ietf-dhc-
