> "Clint" == Clint Chaplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Clint> Has an email list been set up for this effort yet?
Clint> On 12/22/05, Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, pre-wg this is being discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However the WG will get its own mailing list if approv
Pekka,
Is there a particular reason why the proposed charter does not mention
EAP-TTLS?
I know very little about different EAP types, but as a potential
operator and user of EAP, I'd definitely want to see focus on
something like EAP-TTLS.
Given that EAP-TTLS seems to be becoming an indust
Clint Chaplin wrote:
Has an email list been set up for this effort yet?
We are currently operating under the "secmech" list:
General Discussion: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Subscribe: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secmech
Archive:http://www.ietf.org/mail-a
Has an email list been set up for this effort yet?
On 12/22/05, Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, The IESG wrote:
> > - An update to RFC 2716 to bring EAP-TLS into standards track, clarify
> > specification, interoperability, and implementation issues gathered over the
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, The IESG wrote:
- An update to RFC 2716 to bring EAP-TLS into standards track, clarify
specification, interoperability, and implementation issues gathered over the
years, and update the document to meet the requirements of RFC 3748, RFC 4017,
and EAP keying framework document
