The IANA function was split?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
--bill
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 2/25/2011 1:34 PM, bill manning wrote:
The IANA function was split?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
Then the IETF will find its world more tightly constrained (as it should
be...).
Todd
--bill
___
Ietf
On 2011-02-26 10:34, bill manning wrote:
> The IANA function was split?
RFC 2860 already did that. It seems to work well.
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
I'm glad to see they are up to date:
"Paper submissions should
include a three and one-half inch
com
[cross-posting greatly reduced]
Brian,
On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2011-02-26 10:34, bill manning wrote:
>> The IANA function was split?
> RFC 2860 already did that.
I believe Bill was suggesting having multiple organizations perform the
different "IANA function
>> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
>
>I'm glad to see they are up to date:
>"Paper submissions should include a three and one-half inch computer
>diskette in HTML, ASCII, Word or WordPerfect format (please specify
>version)."
I think this is their subtle wa
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:00 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2011/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf
>>
>> I'm glad to see they are up to date:
>
>> "Paper submissions should include a three and one-half inch computer
>> diskette in HTML, ASCII, Word or WordPerfect format