What RFC 2460 means (was: Re: RFC 2434 term IESG approval (Re: IANA Action: Assignment ofan IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option))

--On Wednesday, 06 July, 2005 17:28 +0200 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It isn't really that bad, the option with 17 in the low 5 bits and 0 in the upper 3 is a different option than the one with 17 in the low 5 bits and 7 in the upper 3. So, really there are 8 distint groups

Re: What RFC 2460 means (was: Re: RFC 2434 term IESG approval (Re: IANA Action: Assignment ofan IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option))

John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, 06 July, 2005 17:28 +0200 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Robert Elz wrote:] It isn't really that bad, the option with 17 in the low 5 bits and 0 in the upper 3 is a different option than the one with 17 in the low 5 bits

Re: What RFC 2460 means (was: Re: RFC 2434 term IESG approval (Re: IANA Action: Assignment ofan IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option))

--On Wednesday, 06 July, 2005 20:37 -0400 John Leslie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, 06 July, 2005 17:28 +0200 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Robert Elz wrote:] It isn't really that bad, the option with 17 in the low 5 bits