Re: What basis we have to construct NHAF for IBGP and EBGP?

2008-11-24 Thread Venkateshwaran R
Hi Jaghori Thanks for you response. Actually R1 and R3 routers are our simulation routers. Simply those routers are responding TCP packets and BGP messages to maintain the session with R2. Our application simulates like BGP router. Here R1 establishes IBGP connection against R2. Similarly

Re: What basis we have to construct NHAF for IBGP and EBGP?

2008-11-22 Thread AJ Jaghori
Venkat, Can you provide some further configs on R1 and R3? I'm a bit confused as to how Cisco is advertising these routes? On 11/21/08, Venkateshwaran R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am Venkateshwaran(Venkat in short) from Chennai, India. Please clarify my doubt in BGP4+ how next hop field

What basis we have to construct NHAF for IBGP and EBGP?

2008-11-21 Thread Venkateshwaran R
Hi I am Venkateshwaran(Venkat in short) from Chennai, India. Please clarify my doubt in BGP4+ how next hop field is constructed? Setup = Three routers RT1 , RT2 and RT3. RT1 and RT2 are in same AS 100. RT3 is different AS 200. RT1 and RT3 is connected with RT2. Under this setup i need to