ENUM is not deadborn if it forced onto the ILECs as a replacement for SS7
for E.164 URIs.
F.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Dambier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 29, 2006 2:46 PM
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Why DNS sucks for referrals (was Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how
to
Are you saying that ENUM is a dead end?
interesting question. probably not, as long as it's only used for a few
services that are implemented by large well-managed service providers.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman
Francois Menard wrote:
Are you saying that ENUM is a dead end?
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
819 692 1383
ENUM is a dead born child.
ENUM is supposed to be good for VoIP. Well, I do have VoIP but my VoIP
does work allthough ENUM does not. My router could use ENUM - but which
one should I ask, "e
Are you saying that ENUM is a dead end?
F.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
819 692 1383
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Keith Moore wrote:
- DNS is often out of sync with reality
Dynamic DNS updates are your friend.
From an app developer's point-of-view, DDNS is worthless. DDNS is far
from universally implem
- DNS is often out of sync with reality
Dynamic DNS updates are your friend.
From an app developer's point-of-view, DDNS is worthless. DDNS is far
from universally implemented, and when it is implemented, it's often
implemented badly. DDNS can actually makes DNS a less reliable source
of in
