Isn't it more productive than beating the dead horse?
If reasons are recognized, it will be useful information to
design alternatives, maybe by alternative standardization
bodies.
Masataka Ohta
___
Ietf
It didn't. For an effort always expected to take at least 15 years,
we are doing OK.
It is always good to learn from history, of course.
Brian
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 04:38:37PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
It didn't. For an effort always expected to take at least 15 years,
we are doing OK.
It is always good to learn from history, of course.
That's funny. I recall that when we started we expected it to *last* 15
years,
At 17:52 18/11/2004, Scott W Brim wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 04:38:37PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
It didn't. For an effort always expected to take at least 15 years,
we are doing OK.
It is always good to learn from history, of course.
That's funny. I recall that when we
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 09:27:55PM +0100, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin allegedly wrote:
At 17:52 18/11/2004, Scott W Brim wrote:
That's funny. I recall that when we started we expected it to *last* 15
years, or less, during which time we would come up with a truly new
routing addressing architecture.
