>about 802.1x

2001-11-26 Thread duyong16

about 802.1x

2001-11-21 Thread duyong16
In 802.11,if 802.1x authentication messages are not be encrypted,user are vulnerable to denial of service.For example,attackers can send error response to authenticator before the valid user because of media contention(DCF),so the authenticator will set controlled-port "unauthorized". To

about 802.1x

2001-11-16 Thread duyong16
if using EAP-MD5 authentication mechanism,how to deliver key to authenticator?

>RE: about 802.1x

2001-10-20 Thread duyong16
I want to know that is why. do you know?

Re: about 802.1x

2001-10-18 Thread justin
I think that is what the quoted passage means. I would guess that it is stated because the EAPOL frames are meant to be "host to switch" communication, and therefore, tagging is not needed. Regards, Justin On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 06:38 AM, TOMSON ERIC wrote: > I'm not sure, but I

RE: about 802.1x

2001-10-18 Thread TOMSON ERIC
I'm not sure, but I guess there will be no 802.1Q VLAN tagging, while there will be 802.1p prioritization tagging. I mean, those frames would not use the VLAN tagging fields, while they would use the priority fields. Could somebody confirm? E.T. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

about 802.1x

2001-10-18 Thread duyong16
hi In 7.4 of IEEE Std 802.1x-2001, why to say " EAPOL frames transmitted by a PAE shall not be VLAN tagged, but may optionally be priority tagged"?