-
From: Simon Josefsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:21 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: John C Klensin; Powers Chuck-RXCP20; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but it doesn't
: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 4:48 PM +0200 Simon Josefsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the IPR WG, in its wisdom, has concluded, in some
phrasing
that was changed fairly late in the game
Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the result will (appropriately) be to have more
finely tuned IPR declarations, which make it clear that the declaration
is targeted at the specific standard in question, and is not applicable
beyond that, inside or outside of the IETF
On 2008-08-20 12:03, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the result will (appropriately) be to have more
finely tuned IPR declarations, which make it clear that the declaration
is targeted at the specific standard in question, and is not applicable
beyond
Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but it doesn't change the fact that our rules (both old and
proposed new) only allow two very specific deviations from the
grant of license for derivative works.
Agreed.
I assumed Chuck talked about patent disclosures when he said IPR
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the IPR WG, in its wisdom, has concluded, in some phrasing
that was changed fairly late in the game, that the IETF Trust should
get enough rights in I-Ds to authorize all sorts of subsequent uses of
them and their content, with no time limit.
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 4:48 PM +0200 Simon Josefsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, the IPR WG, in its wisdom, has concluded, in some
phrasing that was changed fairly late in the game, that the
IETF Trust should get enough rights in I-Ds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John C Klensin
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:23 PM
To: Simon Josefsson
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
--On Friday, August 15, 2008 4:48 PM +0200
Powers Chuck-RXCP20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO this simply underscores the valid separation of patent
rights and copyright rights in the IETF process, that some still seem to
be confused over.
Indeed, and I believe that various IETF documents' prolific use of the
term IPR has significantly
