Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Stan

2011-03-06 Thread Julian Reschke
On 02.03.2011 15:11, Julian Reschke wrote: ... Proposed change for the three items in 4.3: o Many platforms do not use Internet Media Types ([RFC2046]) to hold type information in the file system, but rely on filename extensions instead. Trusting the server-provided file extension could

Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Stan

2011-03-02 Thread Julian Reschke
On 01.03.2011 17:00, Barry Leiba wrote: I agree that this needs tuning; but I'd rather not invent a new keyword for that. Sensible. The appendix D (http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.html#rfc.section.D) isn't meant to be normative; thus I believe leaving it

Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.txt (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Stan

2011-03-01 Thread Barry Leiba
I agree that this needs tuning; but I'd rather not invent a new keyword for that. Sensible. The appendix D (http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-06.html#rfc.section.D) isn't meant to be normative; thus I believe leaving it the way it is ought to be ok. OK.