r 02, 2007 5:55 AM
> To: Tobias Gondrom
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [secdir] draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Many thanks for your review. Please see i
Hi Tobias,
Many thanks for your review. Please see inline for my thoughts on your
observations.
On 10/1/2007 9:39 AM, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
Hello,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.
Hello,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
Jari Arkko wrote:
Alexey,
I am looking for a lightweight process that doesn't introduce as much
delay as a typical WG does.
I'm not sure the SG process is what you are looking for.
Hi Jari,
I think your reply just confirmed that.
FYI: Depending what you do, you may have differen
Alexey,
> I am looking for a lightweight process that doesn't introduce as much
> delay as a typical WG does.
I'm not sure the SG process is what you are looking for.
FYI: Depending what you do, you may have different alternatives, too
besides creating a BOF, then WG, and completing your docume
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Bernard,
I quickly looked through your draft. I don't think it applies for a case when
there is no intention to form a WG. Is my understanding correct?
Section 2 says:
"The Charter for a Study Group SHOULD include at least the following
milestones:
o Developme
> Bernard,
> I quickly looked through your draft. I don't think it applies for a case when
> there is no intention to form a WG. Is my understanding correct?
Section 2 says:
"The Charter for a Study Group SHOULD include at least the following
milestones:
o Development of a Working Group C
existing BOF process has limited our options. For an alternative, see:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt
I will study your draft, thank you for the pointer.
Bernard,
I quickly looked through your draft. I don't think it applies for a case
when there
