Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-13 (was: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard)

2009-05-16 Thread ned+ietf
> --On Saturday, May 16, 2009 07:23 -0700 Ned Freed > wrote: > >> Comment on new text introduced into -13. The text in a new > >> bullet in 6.3 says > > > >> > o MIME's [RFC2045] and [RFC2046] allow for the transport of > >> > true multimedia material, which has obvious applicability > >> > to

Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-13 (was: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard)

2009-05-16 Thread John C Klensin
--On Saturday, May 16, 2009 07:23 -0700 Ned Freed wrote: >> Comment on new text introduced into -13. The text in a new >> bullet in 6.3 says > >> > o MIME's [RFC2045] and [RFC2046] allow for the transport of >> > true multimedia material, which has obvious applicability >> > to internationali

Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-13 (was: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard)

2009-05-16 Thread ned+ietf
> Comment on new text introduced into -13. The text in a new > bullet in 6.3 says > > o MIME's [RFC2045] and [RFC2046] allow for the transport of > > true multimedia material, which has obvious applicability > > to internationalization. > It is not obvious at all. Excuse me? If it isn't obvious

draft-crocker-email-arch-13 (was: Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard)

2009-05-15 Thread John C Klensin
Comment on new text introduced into -13. The text in a new bullet in 6.3 says > o MIME's [RFC2045] and [RFC2046] allow for the transport of > true multimedia material, which has obvious applicability > to internationalization. It is not obvious at all. MIME does three things: (i) It ch