Is there a proper place to discuss
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-o1.txt ?
There has been some discussion of the draft in the ASRG list, but no one
their seems to be aware of the most appropriate venue for such discussion,
nor does a visit to the IETF website.
--On 4. desember 2005 10:26 -0500 Daniel Feenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a proper place to discuss
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-o1.txt ?
There has been some discussion of the draft in the ASRG list, but no one
their seems to be aware of the most
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 4. desember 2005 10:26 -0500 Daniel Feenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a proper place to discuss
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-o1.txt ?
There has been some discussion of the draft in the ASRG
Daniel == Daniel Feenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Is there a proper place to discuss
Daniel
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-o1.txt
Daniel ?
Hi. This is by no means any sort of official response, just my own
personal opinion.
You can talk
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:29 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Feenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Is there a proper place to discuss
Daniel
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dnsbl-harmful-o1.txt
Daniel ?
You can talk to the author of that
