Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP

2004-12-14 Thread Sam Hartman
Scott == Scott Bradner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Scott open from last version I'd change BCP publication to using its normal consensus processes (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process) Scott I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the

Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP

2004-12-13 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: open from last version I'd change BCP publication to using its normal consensus processes (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process) I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term BCP yet

Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP

2004-12-13 Thread Scott Bradner
:37 +0100 From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott Bradner [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP --On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: open from last version I'd change BCP

draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP

2004-12-12 Thread Scott Bradner
open from last version I'd change BCP publication to using its normal consensus processes (BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process) I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term BCP yet the term (the meaning of which may change in the future) is still used