At the moment, the best "overall" site is
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/adminrest/ - the timeline has pointers to
most of the important documents, I think.
Harald
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 14:02:16 -0800 "Randy.Dunlap"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote
At 23:01 08/12/2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 13:26:50 +0100 "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we want to get WSIS support and subsequent R&D public fundings as RFC
3869 calls for...
RFC 3869 does not talk about support for the IETF st
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Is there some web page(s) or drafts where I can read to try
to catch up on what this (these) discussions are all about,
regarding reorg., governance, supporting organizations, etc.?
Thanks.
--
~Randy
___
Ietf mailing list
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 13:26:50 +0100 "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we want to get WSIS support and subsequent R&D public fundings as RFC
3869 calls for...
RFC 3869 does not talk about support for the IETF standards process, but
for research on the Internet
I must be missing something. It seems to me that this BCP is for defining
the administrative function and how that administrative function will
interact with its parents (IETF and ISOC).
It does not seem to me that there is any reason to have, in this document,
an attempted definition of the I
If we want to get WSIS support and subsequent R&D public fundings as RFC
3869 calls for, we need a short and clear description, in the draft, of
what is discussed today. A statement that everyone can understand, quote
and consider as acceptable whatever the changes the Internet Governance may
m
