> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Hector Santos
>
> The IETF should be leading the charge for easy to use, multi-device
> readiness cyberspacing virtual meeting places, including better
> electronic groupware collaboration tools, etc. It is undoubtedly and
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mikael Abrahamsson
>
> Personally I believe there could be value in describing what the value
> is to attend the meeting physically. I attended the last meeting in
> Stockholm because it meant I only had to pay the entrence
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, George, Wes wrote:
>> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Mikael Abrahamsson
>>
>> Personally I believe there could be value in describing what the value
>> is to attend the meeting physically. I attended the last meeting in
>
On 11/12/2012 8:29 AM, George, Wes wrote:
Remote participants are figuratively (and often
literally) invisible, and therefore people forget about them, and
they get relegated to second-class status as a participant.
It is easy for this to be true; it takes effort to make it not true.
I be
> "George" == George, Wes writes:
George> First and foremost, the act of getting away from the office
George> and the financial and time commitments involved in traveling
George> to a physical meeting a few times a year tends to reinforce
George> the need to "prepare" for the
