> "Marshall" == Marshall Eubanks writes:
Marshall> Please note that some groups use jabber more or less
Marshall> continuously, not just
Marshall> during a meeting.
I'd like to encourage more of this too.
more people should join hallway during the meeting time as well.
--
Please note that some groups use jabber more or less continuously, not
just during a meeting.
Regards
Marshall
On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Jabber logs are already part of the proceedings. For example, this
URL provides the jabber logs for the IETF 73 in Minneapolis: htt
Jabber logs are already part of the proceedings. For example, this
URL provides the jabber logs for the IETF 73 in Minneapolis:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/index.html
The Secretariat is looking at some changes to the proceedings, and I
have asked them to put the jabber log and the a
if `egrep -v 'joins the room|leaves the room' log | wc -l` > 0
post log
Translation: if, after removing the "joins the room" and "leaves the
room" messages are removed, you wind up with anything left, post the
log. This would eliminate almost all of the logs that have no
substantive inform
Excerpts from Tim Polk on Wed, Apr 01, 2009 10:53:38AM -0400:
> Good point. If we are serious about this, automating it is the only
> reasonable path.
but to start with maybe the chairs could send it out by hand? They
submit the meeting notes by hand.
__
Good point. If we are serious about this, automating it is the only
reasonable path. I like the idea of a minimum size for automatic
submission. If it is short but really important (e.g., "The AD closed
the wg."), then we can always manually submit the jabber log.
On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:48
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
I would like to see this, and if we expect it to happen, I'd suggest
automating it. Should be simple enough (assume IETF Pl
Scott Brim - le (m/j/a) 4/1/09 2:37 PM:
Excerpts from Dave CROCKER on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 11:43:29PM -0700:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
at their worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
email arc
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
I would like to see this, and if w
Excerpts from Dave CROCKER on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 11:43:29PM -0700:
> IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
> at their worst, each one isn't all that big.
>
> It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
> email archive, perhaps simply by sending the
Dave CROCKER wrote:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
When I've chaired working groups I've found the
Jabber logs to be invaluable for help putting together
minutes, and occasionally for clarifying post-meeting
ques
On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:43 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
at their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
email archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list
Dave CROCKER wrote:
> IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
> their worst, each one isn't all that big.
>
> It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
> archive, perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
makes sen
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg In
14 matches
Mail list logo
