On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:19:39 -0800, Harald Alvestrand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On 9. november 2006 07:20 -0800 "Narayanan, Vidya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Avri,
> > You make valid points. However, I assume that a company system
> > administrator has nothing to do with th
--On 9. november 2006 07:20 -0800 "Narayanan, Vidya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Avri,
You make valid points. However, I assume that a company system
administrator has nothing to do with the IETF.
That assumption is unfounded.
Several of us run our IETF-related services out of non-corpor
erent landscape from a network
administrator who does not have a clue about the IETF.
Regards,
Vidya
> -Original Message-
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:41 PM
> To: IETF-Discussion
> Subject: Re: nomcom and confidential
Hi,
To add a tidbit. There has long been a notion of an umbrella of
confidentiality in Nomcom. Which means that anyone who has, or is
given access, to any of the confidential information has to agree to
keep the information confidential. While I have paid very little
attention t nomcom
Bob Hinden wrote:
Danny,
What The liaisons are there to provide additional information,
not directly influence the outcome.
Do you have more information on this? If this is true, I think the
result from that Nomcom is questionable. I think this needs to be
investigated and the res
--On Tuesday, November 07, 2006 17:46 -0500 Ralph Droms
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob - depends on the meaning of "straw poll". Any vote that
results in an action should be restricted to the 10 voting
members. My understanding of "straw poll" is an opinion poll
that results in no direct a
On Nov 7, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
Bob - depends on the meaning of "straw poll". Any vote that
results in an
action should be restricted to the 10 voting members. My
understanding of
"straw poll" is an opinion poll that results in no direct action.
Agree, as is mine.
-danny
Bob - depends on the meaning of "straw poll". Any vote that results in an
action should be restricted to the 10 voting members. My understanding of
"straw poll" is an opinion poll that results in no direct action.
But I'm speculating and don't know what "straw poll" means in the context
we're di
Danny,
What The liaisons are there to provide additional
information, not directly influence the outcome.
Do you have more information on this? If this is true, I think
the result from that Nomcom is questionable. I think this needs
to be investigated and the result be made public.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
I think some of Laksminath's concern is valid.
But I think the solution to the problem is simple:
Make it publicly known who is on the technical staff that supports the
Nomcom, and make it clear that these people:
1) May learn Nomcom information a
On Nov 7, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
What The liaisons are there to provide additional information,
not directly influence the outcome.
Do you have more information on this? If this is true, I think the
result from that Nomcom is questionable. I think this needs to be
Hi,
on 2006-11-07 05:37 Harald Alvestrand said the following:
> I think some of Laksminath's concern is valid.
> But I think the solution to the problem is simple:
>
> Make it publicly known who is on the technical staff that supports the
> Nomcom, and make it clear that these people:
>
> 1) Ma
Lakshminath,
By the way, last I checked "liaisons" are "not voting members." In
one of the nomcoms I was in, the liaisons were allowed to vote in
straw polls. It was a terrible idea. It negates the checks and
balances we have put into the nomcom process, for instance no more
than 2 peo
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:37:37AM -0800, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I think some of Laksminath's concern is valid.
> But I think the solution to the problem is simple:
>
> Make it publicly known who is on the technical staff that supports the
> Nomcom, and make it clear that these people:
>
> 1
I think some of Laksminath's concern is valid.
But I think the solution to the problem is simple:
Make it publicly known who is on the technical staff that supports the
Nomcom, and make it clear that these people:
1) May learn Nomcom information as a side effect of their technical work to
sup
Fred,
When I saw a non-nomcom member having access to what I thought was
nomcom-confidential, I was very concerned and now doubt the entire
process. I was told that it is secure, but it has not been verified
as far as I can tell. At this point, no offense to the tools team, I
remain unconvi
16 matches
Mail list logo
