Frank,
I saw your withdrawal on the IETF list, at least.
The repeated posting seems to be someone messing things up in China; it
contains the following interesting headers:
Received: from [202.99.23.227] (helo=people.com.cn)
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33)
id 1CNwBc-0004
Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: objections: draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-06.txt
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Frank,
>
> I'm st
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Frank Thompson
> > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:21 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: objections: draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-06.txt
> >
> >
>
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Frank Thompson
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: objections: draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-06.txt
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
I would like to raise an issue with this draft which is currently in "Last
Call" in regards to the storage of the extension element:
Currently:
3.1.2 EPP Command
.
.
The element contains one or more elements
that contain the following chil
