SM wrote:
>
> At 13:09 19-04-2009, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>
>>> It would be very much appreciated if someone could explain this
>>> "resignation" business that recently spilled over into the IETF
>>> discussion list.
>>>
>>> W
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:17:31PM +0200,
Francis Dupont wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
> this was and is the rule but because of typewriters the rule was
> suspended during the 20th century. Now typewriters are in museums
> and current century is 21th. BTW accents can be necessary to
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:
> => this was and is the rule but because of typewriters the rule was
> suspended during the 20th century. Now typewriters are in museums
> and current century is 21th. BTW accents can be necessary to avoid
> some ambiguities (cf 2nd r
In your previous mail you wrote:
I gather that this has something to do with French capitals. Would
that be whether a letter with an accent retains the accent when
capitalized?
=> this was and is the rule but because of typewriters the rule was
suspended during the 20th century. Now
> James Seng wrote:
> Their behavior, their language and method of argument leads
> many of us in IDNAbis as well as participants in LTRU that
> they are a sock puppet of JFC.
There is no room for interpretation in this matter. They are. Although I
do not represent the French IETF community, their
Actually its was over the mapping of the character Arabic TATWEEL, which
they objected. They refused to cease discussion on ML-DNS when it is pointed
out to them it is out of scope.
Their behavior, their language and method of argument leads many of us in
IDNAbis as well as participants in LTRU th
At 11:45 PM +0200 4/19/09, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>I gather that this has something to do with French capitals.
Only to small extent; it is much more about personalities.
This will probably come up during IETF Last Call; maybe postpone the fun until
then, or if you're really interested, joi
On 19 apr 2009, at 22:56, SM wrote:
Where did all of this start?
This started in the IDNAbis WG. The WG Chair sent a message to a
participant warning him that his posting rights may be removed [1].
Another participant was also warned [2]. The WG Chair then removed
posting privileges f
appreciated if someone could explain this
"resignation" business that recently spilled over into the IETF
discussion list.
Where did all of this start?
This started in the IDNAbis WG. The WG Chair sent a message to a
participant warning him that his posting rights may be removed [1].
At 13:09 19-04-2009, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
It would be very much appreciated if someone could explain this
"resignation" business that recently spilled over into the IETF
discussion list.
Where did all of this start?
This started in the IDNAbis WG. The WG Chair sent a me
It would be very much appreciated if someone could explain this
"resignation" business that recently spilled over into the IETF
discussion list.
Where did all of this start?
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailma
11 matches
Mail list logo
