This is a secdir review of the above draft.
The text looks fine. However, I'm concerned that this specification does
not provide sufficient detail for interoperable implementation. It
makes it clear that a GKMS needs to allocate SIDs but does not cite any
mechanism for a GKMS to do so.
I think
Hi Sam,
Thanks for your review.
On Jul 14, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
This is a secdir review of the above draft.
The text looks fine. However, I'm concerned that this specification
does
not provide sufficient detail for interoperable implementation. It
makes it clear that a G
> "Brian" == Brian Weis writes:
Brian> There is an I-D for one GKMS (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-06)
Brian> that includes support for SIDs which could be referenced. It
Brian> is expected to head to WGLC soon. Would citing that document
Brian> address your concern?
A normativ
