Hi,
I did a secdir review of this document to alert the SEC ADs to any new
security considerations.
Something I did not add to my review was a non-security concern.
Why was the secdir asked to review this non-WG document?
Or, more accurately, why is this topic not being handled as a WG item?
I
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just