Michael Richardson wrote:
"Melinda" == Melinda Shore writes:
Melinda> suppose explains the 2544 packages. I'd certainly never
Melinda> deny people the ability to easily maintain unused and
Melinda> unnecessary software and we're headed *way* off-topic, but
Melinda> I was just s
Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> > "Melinda" == Melinda Shore writes:
> Melinda> suppose explains the 2544 packages. I'd certainly never
> Melinda> deny people the ability to easily maintain unused and
> Melinda> unnecessary software and we're headed *way* off-topic, but
> Me
On 02/04/2010 08:18 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
2544 different packages installed in my main computer.
!!!
It happens. So you want xterm. That's one package, but it depends on a
few for the shared libraries and a whole lot for fonts. Xter
> "Melinda" == Melinda Shore writes:
Melinda> suppose explains the 2544 packages. I'd certainly never
Melinda> deny people the ability to easily maintain unused and
Melinda> unnecessary software and we're headed *way* off-topic, but
Melinda> I was just struck by how odd it se
On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
It is probably true that manually installing xml2rfc is easy in
itself - just
download the new file and unzip it a the right place. On the other
hand, I have
2544 different packages installed in my main computer.
!!!
Anyway, I don't
On 02/04/2010 08:42 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> apt-get update is so much easier.
>
> I'm not sold (I totally hate ports systems), but
> anyway, I'm specifically confused why somebody who's
> been anxious to get their hands on 1.34 wouldn't download
> it themselves, or ju
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi Melinda,
On 10-02-04 11:25 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
If you are one of the persons who were frustrated waiting for the
"new" 1.34 version of xml2rfc to get into the Ubuntu disribution
channels,
I'm unclear on this - why wouldn't they pick i
Hi Melinda,
On 10-02-04 11:25 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
If you are one of the persons who were frustrated waiting for the
"new" 1.34 version of xml2rfc to get into the Ubuntu disribution
channels,
I'm unclear on this - why wouldn't they pick it up from resource.org?
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
apt-get update is so much easier.
I'm not sold (I totally hate ports systems), but
anyway, I'm specifically confused why somebody who's
been anxious to get their hands on 1.34 wouldn't download
it themselves, or just run it through the website. My
experience has been th
On 02/04/2010 05:25 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
If you are one of the persons who were frustrated waiting for the
"new" 1.34 version of xml2rfc to get into the Ubuntu disribution
channels,
I'm unclear on this - why wouldn't they pick it up from resource.org?
apt-get updat
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
If you are one of the persons who were frustrated waiting for the
"new" 1.34 version of xml2rfc to get into the Ubuntu disribution
channels,
I'm unclear on this - why wouldn't they pick it up from resource.org?
Melinda
___
Hi Folks,
If you are one of the persons who were frustrated waiting for the
"new" 1.34 version of xml2rfc to get into the Ubuntu disribution
channels, you can pick it up from the debian ftp registry at
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/x/xml2rfc/xml2rfc_1.34-1_all.deb
Cheers
Suresh
12 matches
Mail list logo
