On Sun, 25 Dec 2022, you wrote:
>> It's easy to sort wanted mail between forwards/mailing-lists and normal
>> narrow-casted mail. Spam can masquerade as either; but if possible a
>> spammer would want to look like narrow-casted mail as that is the only
>> kind that could be expected to arrive from
On 12/25/22 7:55 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:31 AM Barry Leiba
wrote:
I agree with Mike and Scott on the point that it’s worth
explicitly allowing the result to be a “can’t do it” publication.
Implicit “couldn’t do it” is fine in most cases, but here
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 6:31 AM Barry Leiba wrote:
> I agree with Mike and Scott on the point that it’s worth explicitly
> allowing the result to be a “can’t do it” publication. Implicit “couldn’t
> do it” is fine in most cases, but here we might say something like, “If the
> working group decid
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 9:12 PM Michael Deutschmann
wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022, you wrote:
> > > Blind-carbon-copy is already a sign of spam.
> >
> > Except when it's not, like this very mailing list.
>
> Only if you don't whitelist *all* forwarders you set up and mailing lists
> you have joine
I agree with Mike and Scott on the point that it’s worth explicitly
allowing the result to be a “can’t do it” publication. Implicit “couldn’t
do it” is fine in most cases, but here we might say something like, “If the
working group decides that none of the proposed approaches will work
acceptably
