Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM update - header tag

2023-03-13 Thread Jan Dušátko
Dne 13. 3. 2023 v 16:08 Murray S. Kucherawy napsal(a): On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jan Dušátko wrote: I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group. My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this tasks require also management of records required for

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Process Questions

2023-03-13 Thread Michael Thomas
On 3/13/23 8:14 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: Our current milestones are: Apr 2023 - Post a consensus problem statement draft to the datatracker (may  not go to the IESG)  Jun 2023 - Proposal regarding plans for remaining document(s) presented to  the AD

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Process Questions

2023-03-13 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:19 AM Michael Thomas wrote: > On 3/10/23 7:46 AM, Laura Atkins wrote: > > > On 10 Mar 2023, at 00:30, Michael Thomas > wrote: > > Now that we have a chair, I have a question about process wrt to the > charter. The charter states that either the working group will prod

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM update - header tag

2023-03-13 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jan Dušátko wrote: > I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group. > My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this > tasks require also management of records required for that protection. > We have huge problem with identific

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dkim-replay-00.txt

2023-03-13 Thread Wei Chuang
Sorry for the delay. Top level, I agree that this draft tightens up the details in a beneficial way, and the working group ought to work off the crocker version. I'm happy to also merge this version in my problem-statement draft also. My interpretation of the changes, is that the crocker draft r