Hi Bron,
On 01/09/2023 02:02, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Fact: recipient spam filter has more information than sender spam filter
I've no axe to grind here, but wondered - is there e.g. a
peer-reviewed publication that conclusively demonstrates
that?
Not saying that that's necessary, but I wondere
On 12/02/2023 17:28, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Have they not been getting consideration? I know I've been replying to
many of his comments.
I didn't mean to imply he was being ignored, sorry if
it sounded that way.
Cheers,
S.
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Hiya,
FWIW, as this discussion has a bit of a flavour of one person
arguing with a bigger bunch of people, I'd like to say that
Mike is asking good questions that deserve consideration.
I don't have a position as to what may or may not be worth
doing in this space, but I figure I'll find it eas
Hiya,
On 03/12/2022 06:38, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I've placed what I believe is the text that is closest to consensus in the
datatracker:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/
Please provide comments or criticism soon. Once it appears to be stable
relative to this audience,
n just
publishing private keys when one is finished with
'em (plus a bit).
S.
>
> ==Mike
>
>> On Aug 10, 2020, at 7:06 PM, Stephen Farrell
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/08/2020 23:36, Brandon Long wrote:
>>> Isn't publishing
On 10/08/2020 23:36, Brandon Long wrote:
> Isn't publishing the private key the opposite of recovery?
>
> Ie, it's basically a mechanism for plausible deniability.
>
> "The key is public, anyone could have made that message."
Yep. And for DKIM, it's a mechanism I'd myself like to see
well-defi
Hiya,
Had a quick flick through the paper. Good work but
not something that could yet be immediately used
(which is entirely reasonable). Nonetheless it'd be
good to see work done in this space.
I do however disagree with some of the motivations
for the smarter crypto:
- The authors say: "The p
Hiya,
On 02/10/2019 22:01, Mark Delany wrote:
> What might give it more strength is if many people adopted key swap
> otherwise a solitary Snowden-like operative publishing a private key
> in an essentially obscure location on the Internet is unlikely to
> convince a judge that security thru obsc
Hiya,
On 02/10/2019 20:29, Jon Callas wrote:
> Thus, any discussion of it is good. I really liked it. Please read it.
I will (but haven't yet:-).
Personally I'd advocate for implementations that regularly
cycle signing keys and publish previous private key values,
also in the DNS perhaps, or co
