Re: [ietf-dkim] basic question

2007-01-17 Thread Dave Crocker
Gino Cerullo wrote: Just a basic question here. I've gone over the DKIM spec, but can anyone tell me where the original Yahoo Domainkeys spec is at? Since DKIM is still in a state of flux, I want to just fully implement the orignal DomainKeys spec. DKIM is not 'in a state of flux'. The

Re: [ietf-dkim] basic question

2007-01-17 Thread Douglas Otis
On Jan 17, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: DKIM is not 'in a state of flux'. DKIM's restrictions on linking signatures with a header was premised upon an expectation that visual examination of headers provided a means for recognition. When the entire email-address is expressed i

Re: [ietf-dkim] basic question

2007-01-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:18:32 -0800 Douglas Otis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >DKIM's restrictions on linking signatures with a header was premised >upon an expectation that visual examination of headers provided a >means for recognition. Would you please point me to a reference for this st