On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
(2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in
discussion, mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with
anything else." Again, no clear consensus.
If a new RR can solve the wildcard issue and we feel that this is a
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
(2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4 messages in
discussion, mostly saying "if you support TXT, don't bother with
anything else." Again, no clear consensus.
If a new RR can solve the wildcard issue and we feel that this is a
significant issue worth solvin
(2) SSP record type (TXT vs. something new). Only 4
messages in discussion, mostly saying "if you support
TXT, don't bother with anything else." Again, no
clear consensus.
If a new RR can solve the wildcard issue and we feel that this is a significant
issue worth solving (or at least address
Works for me. Actually, due to vacation schedules, I need to accelerate
that a bit and get the draft submitted by June 15.
So, WG participants (especially the 'usual suspects'), let's hear from you.
-Jim
Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Barry and I would like us to do the following:
>
> C
Hi Jim,
Barry and I would like us to do the following:
Continue the discussion on the list for a few more days since
not all the usual suspects have reacted yet (please do!) and
the context is slightly different (with XPTR anyway) from the
(many;-) other times we've discussed these topics in th
