On Oct 30, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Well my principal proposal would be to add elements into the key
record to allow a key to be associated with a URI from which a cert
chain vouching said key may be obtained.
I already have an ID submitted!
I could add to this list
Well my principal proposal would be to add elements into the key record to
allow a key to be associated with a URI from which a cert chain vouching said
key may be obtained.
I already have an ID submitted!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stephen Farrell
Doug,
That was discussed at length in the WG and we ended up
where we ended up.
I'm sure you'll make the point again in IETF LC, (which is
entirely fine), but we don't need to revisit the topic on
this list, so please stop raising it here.
If you think you have some compelling reason that we
sh
John Levine wrote:
> It is certainly the kind of bug that occurs in PHP scripts when the
> programmer doesn't perfectly understand the quoting rules. It\'s happened
> to me.
I'm collecting a set of common mistakes breaking DKIM signatures.
Mentioning a web interface to DNS and PHP brings the fol
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:26 AM, John R Levine wrote:
>> I think most of the likely candidate domains for using
>> "discardable" would disagree with your assertion John.
>
> Then I have to say that they don't understand what discardable
> means. Really, it says feel free to throw our mail away if
Is there any chance that this is an OS inspired edit? Perhaps the web
front end has a built in escape clause
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ
Crepin-Leblond
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:22 AM
To: John Levine; ietf-dkim@mipas
> Is there any chance that this is an OS inspired edit? Perhaps the web
> front end has a built in escape clause
It is certainly the kind of bug that occurs in PHP scripts when the
programmer doesn't perfectly understand the quoting rules. It\'s happened
to me.
R's,
John
> -Original Messa
duly noted
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, John L wrote:
>> A reasonable concern, but it seems to me that the best response is to
>> educate people about how to create valid DKIM setups. Early in the life
>> of SPF there used to b
+1
Many ISPs do not input records directly into the zone files. Their front end is
often a
web-based interface and get pre-processed by a system checking validity before
being
updated in the zone file automatically using script(s).
My ISP (as in, I am a client of theirs), one of the largest in t
