Douglas Otis wrote:
1) Why?
There is use in specifying an API here. Every other protocol we've
named so far as examples have an API, whether de facto from lots of
experience, or implicit from the spec that defines it the protocol,
or something actually explicit defining the API.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:18 AM, hector wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:
1) Why?
There is use in specifying an API here. Every other protocol
we've named so far as examples have an API, whether de facto from
lots of experience, or implicit from the spec that defines it the
protocol, or
Douglas Otis wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:18 AM, hector wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:
1) Why?
There is use in specifying an API here. Every other protocol
we've named so far as examples have an API, whether de facto from
lots of experience, or implicit from the spec that defines it
Douglas Otis wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:18 AM, hector wrote:
This is why I as seeking an answer to why just d= and not anything
else. What it for a reputation system?
The response from a closed group of large email providers regarding
how they would like to have their reputation
