Re: [ietf-dkim] DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment

2010-02-22 Thread Dave CROCKER
On 2/22/2010 1:46 PM, Polk, William T. wrote: > Didn’t quite make Friday COB, but I just posted a revised discuss. I > hope this helps us reach resolution! Tim, Concerning the revision you have posted to your Discuss:

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter

2010-02-22 Thread Franck Martin
it seems point 5 should be extended to "forwarding including mailing lists" All the rest looks good. - Original Message - From: "Barry Leiba" To: "IETF DKIM WG" Sent: Friday, 19 February, 2010 11:31:56 AM Subject: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter Here is a charter proposal for us to ba

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter

2010-02-22 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > > --On 21 February 2010 07:51:34 -0500 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" > wrote: > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > >> Sent:

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter

2010-02-22 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 21 February 2010 07:51:34 -0500 "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba >> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:32 PM >> To: IETF DKIM WG >> Subject: [ietf