John,
> Yes, of course. The signature means that this message really truly
> came from the mailing list, as opposed to being a random piece of spam
> that happened to resemble list mail. What else would it mean? Lists
> have never promised that the original sender was "real" nor that
> messag
> Lists never have had DKIM to deal with, so they've never had the option to
> make any such promise. The signature lends the MLM's credibility to the
> message, which in turn could hurt the MLM's credibility if it turns out to be
> signing garbage. How else would a reputation for signers work
>> A DKIM-aware resending MLM is encouraged to sign the entire message
>> as it arrived, especially including the original signatures.
>
>Would I as an MLM want to resign a message that I received that itself
>was not signed? Do I want to confer more authority to that message than
>is wa
>If think it would be an error to recommend that MLM handles "ADSP =
>all" in the same way as they handle email with "discardable" domain. If
>so "ADSP = all" will have a very poor difference with "ADSP =
>discardable" a very very low number of domaines will use such ADSP policy.
Agreed. We hav
On 5/17/10 2:47 AM, Serge Aumont wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:48 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
>
>> On 5/11/10 7:37 AM, Serge Aumont wrote:
>> Serge,
>>
>>
>>>-Sympa include DKIM signature verification and use DKIM signature
>>> status in the process of message submission and email commands
>>
On 17/May/10 11:47, Serge Aumont wrote:
> "ADSP = discardable" means : "the domain encourages the recipient(s) to
> discard it.". So a pretty MLM should discard thoses messages unless it
> is able to brodcast it to subscribers without DKIM signature alteration.
> "ADSP = all" does not recommend to
Hi Murray,
Thanks for taking a shot at this. Here are some comments on the Lists
draft.
First, I support the draft becoming a working group document.
However, I wonder if it requires simplification with a bit more
discussion as to motivation. I'll get into some of that below.
Introducti
On 05/11/2010 07:48 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On 5/11/10 7:37 AM, Serge Aumont wrote:
> Serge,
>
>> -Sympa include DKIM signature verification and use DKIM signature
>> status in the process of message submission and email commands
>> -it remove broken pre-existing DKIM signature and keep o
