Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00(fwd)

2010-06-28 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 25 June 2010 16:21:00 -0400 "John R. Levine" wrote: >> I don't recollect you proposing wording that included "silently" so it >> isn't even possible for a person going back and look at the discussions >> to know what you meant. >> >> We are therefore left with what you wrote and which the

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00(fwd)

2010-06-28 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 25 June 2010 14:39:04 -0400 "John R. Levine" wrote: >> We seem to agree that discard means "throw away". > > Evidently. But I do have the advantage of knowing what I meant when I > wrote the section we're arguing about. Right, but knowing what you meant isn't the point. You're arguing ab

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00(fwd)

2010-06-28 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 26 June 2010 01:58:42 + John Levine wrote: >> +1. OpenDKIM actually implements a reject (55x error) with the >> intent of giving the sender/victim an opportunity to detect a >> problem, an idea for which there is some obvious demand, though I >> imagine we should make that configurabl