Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available

2010-07-25 Thread John Levine
>For non-MIME mail, though, isn't a basic text append the way to do it? I suppose, although it is my impression that in non-nerd circles, the amount of non-MIME mail is too small to be worth worrying about. FWIW, I've seen list software edit a footer into the HTML code of a message. Ain't no way

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00 (fwd)

2010-07-25 Thread John Levine
>I'm finally beginning to buy that something akin to DBR may be >necessary, but it's still weird to me that the point is that the >average sysadmin can't be trusted to do ADSP right. But then why, >for example, can he/she be trusted to do DNS or SMTP or even TCP/IP >right without some sort of vouc

Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM errata 1532 and 1596

2010-07-25 Thread Alexey Melnikov
On Thursday, July 22, 2010, Barry Leiba wrote: [...] > > There are three applicable responses: [...] > > Held for document update:  The item is correct, but it is not > immediately critical, and may be incorporated in the next revision of > the document. Barry, I don't think your description is

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00 (fwd)

2010-07-25 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
(More review of old chatter...) > -Original Message- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:07 AM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr- >

Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP, was Lists "BCP" draft available

2010-07-25 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
(More from a review of the lists BCP chatter, with an eye toward a forthcoming document update...) > -Original Message- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:23 PM > To: Scott Kitterm

Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available

2010-07-25 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Going back through a few months of mail on the flight to IETF, preparing to post an update to this draft... The intent of that paragraph is actually not to encourage use of "l=", but rather just to include it in the discussion. An MLM designer will probably want to try "l=" to solve this probl