>For non-MIME mail, though, isn't a basic text append the way to do it?
I suppose, although it is my impression that in non-nerd circles, the
amount of non-MIME mail is too small to be worth worrying about.
FWIW, I've seen list software edit a footer into the HTML code of a
message. Ain't no way
>I'm finally beginning to buy that something akin to DBR may be
>necessary, but it's still weird to me that the point is that the
>average sysadmin can't be trusted to do ADSP right. But then why,
>for example, can he/she be trusted to do DNS or SMTP or even TCP/IP
>right without some sort of vouc
On Thursday, July 22, 2010, Barry Leiba
wrote:
[...]
>
> There are three applicable responses:
[...]
>
> Held for document update: The item is correct, but it is not
> immediately critical, and may be incorporated in the next revision of
> the document.
Barry, I don't think your description is
(More review of old chatter...)
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:07 AM
> To: DKIM List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-
>
(More from a review of the lists BCP chatter, with an eye toward a forthcoming
document update...)
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 2:23 PM
> To: Scott Kitterm
Going back through a few months of mail on the flight to IETF, preparing to
post an update to this draft...
The intent of that paragraph is actually not to encourage use of "l=", but
rather just to include it in the discussion. An MLM designer will probably
want to try "l=" to solve this probl