On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:10:52 -, Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
This raise a specific and interesting technical point. I haven't seen a
response so far, so...
The core of this technology has keys that are named and accessed in
terms of
domain names. It really is fundamental to
Charles,
On 1/13/11 11:41 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
The question of making the public key available is entirely orthogonal to
that core protocol. The DSN mechanism is fine for some applications,
especially where the lifetime of the signature is at most a few weeks. But
other means of
Folks,
Summary of the reactions posted so far...[1]
Some of the postings asked questions or expressed confusion about some
procedural or technical or wg scope fact issues that have already been
answered; so they are not covered here. Also, there might be some relatively
minor points that I've
On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:10:52 -, Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
This raise a specific and interesting technical point. I haven't seen a
response so far, so...
The core of this technology has keys that are named and accessed
On 1/13/11 9:10 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Folks,
Summary of the reactions posted so far...[1]
Some of the postings asked questions or expressed confusion about some
procedural or technical or wg scope fact issues that have already been
answered; so they are not covered here. Also, there
The chairs are happy with how this discussion has been going so far,
except that we remind people that discussion of any details of
iSchedule or any other protocol that might cite DKIM is entirely out
of scope -- we need to accept that people want to use parts of the
DKIM mechanism, and not, at
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory:
-1
Mike
Barry Leiba wrote:
The chairs are happy with how this discussion has been going so far,
except that we remind people that discussion of any details of
iSchedule or any other protocol that might cite DKIM is entirely out
of scope -- we need
Folks,
The two drafts based on the idea of DOSETA are now available.
They were done as individual submissions, rather than working group
submissions,
because they are not currently adopted by the working group.
d/
Original Message #1
Subject: I-D
