Re: [ietf-dkim] Pete's review of 4871bis

2011-07-01 Thread Douglas Otis
On 6/29/11 11:49 AM, Pete Resnick wrote: On 6/29/11 11:20 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote: I agree that 8.14 is poorly written (and it was even worse a while back). However, there most certainly IS an attack here, which is NOT the same as the related attack discussed in 8.15, and cannot be prevented

Re: [ietf-dkim] Pete's review of 4871bis

2011-07-01 Thread Douglas Otis
On 6/30/11 9:53 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: -Original Message- From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:05 AM To: DKIM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Pete's review of 4871bis The problem