On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:58 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Please review and comment by 11 July.
I would have liked to strip even more of the cruft out of 4871bis, but
this is considerably better than the previous draft. Ship it.
Regardless of any remaining cruft, I'm glad to see this particular
On Jul 2, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
We have a week. Murray will be posting the update (-14) very soon.
Please review and comment by 11 July.
The update has been posted. For your convenience:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis/
You can also
Well, I don't wish to be the pessimistic one. The changes only makes
us happy. So we passed the buck to external processes to make sure a
message is RFC5322/4409 ready. Doesn't change the fact that
something, someone has to do it and depending on the implementor, they
will be proactive
