Re: [ietf-dkim] Thoughts on ADSP discardable messages BCC'ing the postmaster? (akin to a FBL)

2012-06-17 Thread John R. Levine
> I'm reading the archives on ADSP and haven't seen anyone pitch the idea > that on verification failure, we could have the message in question would > be BCC'd to the domain owner's administrator for review. I am a teenager with a lot of spare time, so I'm going to send thousands of random messa

Re: [ietf-dkim] Thoughts on ADSP discardable messages BCC'ing the postmaster? (akin to a FBL)

2012-06-17 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
I am a new subscriber to this list, and noticed the most recent post (the one before mine) discussed DMARC, something I haven't heard of before. At first glimpse, it looks like it may solve the problem I wanted to solve. On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Chris Lamont Mankowski < makerofthing...@g

[ietf-dkim] Thoughts on ADSP discardable messages BCC'ing the postmaster? (akin to a FBL)

2012-06-17 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
I'm reading the archives on ADSP and haven't seen anyone pitch the idea that on verification failure, we could have the message in question would be BCC'd to the domain owner's administrator for review. That way there is no need to rely on 3rd party ADSP reliability lists, and in the event the dom