The negative side of the proposal is the requirement to split all multi-recipient-emails to single-recipient-emails, which is a show stopper for me.
I'm with Murray -- why is this a problem? Single recipient has been the de-facto standard for years, and unless you are extremely bandwidth constrained, it's faster.
But I don't think this requirement is needed. I would allow a list of
recipients and have a paragraph which states ...
See previous discussion. We rejected multi-recipient signatures because of the bcc recipipient leakage.
Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
