[ietf-dkim] Is DMARC the right place for SMTP-TLS policy and reporting?

2012-06-19 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
are addressing message authentication via DNS policy, and TLS is used for message authentication when the subject name is trusted and aligned with RFC5322.From. Thanks for your consideration, Chris Lamont Mankowski ___ NOTE WELL: This list operates

[ietf-dkim] Is TLS-OBC for SMTP (in theory) a good alternative to SPF?

2012-06-19 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
I realize my last message talked about TLS-OBC for SMTP but didn't preface it with any information on how I see how it can replace, or compliment SPF in a given situation. First, does anyone know of a working group that is getting TLS-OBC to work in conjunction with the SMTP protocol? Perhaps

[ietf-dkim] Thoughts on ADSP discardable messages BCC'ing the postmaster? (akin to a FBL)

2012-06-17 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
I'm reading the archives on ADSP and haven't seen anyone pitch the idea that on verification failure, we could have the message in question would be BCC'd to the domain owner's administrator for review. That way there is no need to rely on 3rd party ADSP reliability lists, and in the event the

Re: [ietf-dkim] Thoughts on ADSP discardable messages BCC'ing the postmaster? (akin to a FBL)

2012-06-17 Thread Chris Lamont Mankowski
I am a new subscriber to this list, and noticed the most recent post (the one before mine) discussed DMARC, something I haven't heard of before. At first glimpse, it looks like it may solve the problem I wanted to solve. On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Chris Lamont Mankowski makerofthing