Re: [ietf-dkim] A comprehensive DKIM verification specification will not violate protocol layers.

2010-11-23 Thread Charles Lindsey
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:32:41 -, Douglas Otis wrote: > Murray argued singleton header checks to qualify DKIM signatures > violates protocol layering. Which is why I want to fix this problem with normative wording that does not violate protocol layering. Quite simple: Signers MUST/SHOULD

Re: [ietf-dkim] A comprehensive DKIM verification specification will not violate protocol layers.

2010-11-22 Thread Douglas Otis
Murray argued singleton header checks to qualify DKIM signatures violates protocol layering. SMTP messages are exchanged in two parts, a header and a body section. The header section should conform with RFC5322, and the body should conform with RFC2045. RFC2047 and RFC2231 define header encod