Re: [ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10

2009-03-11 Thread pasi.ero...@nokia.com
Dave CROCKER wrote: > pasi.ero...@nokia.com wrote: > >> - I think introducing clear terminology for the identity/identities >> (or identifier/identifiers) "output by DKIM" would make DKIM >> significantly easier to understand, and would be useful in this >> document, too. Places that probably woul

Re: [ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10

2009-03-06 Thread Dave CROCKER
Pasi, Did I miss your response about this substantive point? d/ Dave CROCKER wrote: > pasi.ero...@nokia.com wrote: >> - I think introducing clear terminology for the identity/identities (or >> identifier/identifiers) "output by DKIM" would make DKIM significantly >> easier to understand, and w

Re: [ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10

2009-02-27 Thread Dave CROCKER
Pasi, Thanks for the review. pasi.ero...@nokia.com wrote: > - I think introducing clear terminology for the identity/identities (or > identifier/identifiers) "output by DKIM" would make DKIM significantly > easier to understand, and would be useful in this document, too. > Places that probably w

[ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10

2009-02-27 Thread pasi.ero...@nokia.com
Tony, Dave, Phillip and others, I've finally gone through dkim-overview-10. Basically, it looks good, but I have some suggestions on how to make it more accessible to readers who don't already know what DKIM is, plus some minor nits: - I think introducing clear terminology for the identity/identi