On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/2010 8:36 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
>> Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof.
>>
>> A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being
>> able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for
>> doing the
Mark Delany wrote:
> Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof.
>
> A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being
> able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for
> doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy).
>
> So did anyone catch the news to
On 12/8/2010 8:36 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
> Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof.
>
> A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being
> able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for
> doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy).
>
> So did anyo
Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof.
A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being
able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for
doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy).
So did anyone catch the news today that UPS.com are planning to ve