Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: Getting resolution on the "double header" issue

2011-02-18 Thread Jeff Macdonald
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > This is the last text that I circulated on the bogus header matter, in reply > to Barry's proposed path to resolution.  The group was pretty exhausted from > debate at that point so there was little response. > >> -Original Messag

Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: Getting resolution on the "double header" issue

2011-02-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 03:52:24 pm Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > This is the last text that I circulated on the bogus header matter, in > reply to Barry's proposed path to resolution. The group was pretty > exhausted from debate at that point so there was little response. > > > -Origi

[ietf-dkim] FW: Getting resolution on the "double header" issue

2011-02-16 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
This is the last text that I circulated on the bogus header matter, in reply to Barry's proposed path to resolution. The group was pretty exhausted from debate at that point so there was little response. > -Original Message- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun.