Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt

2009-04-05 Thread Charles Lindsey
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:00:01 +0100, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: Title : RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update Author(s) : D. Crocker Filename: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt Pages : 12

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt

2009-04-05 Thread Barry Leiba
This updates RFC 4871, DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures. Specifically the document clarifies the nature, roles and relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are candidates for payload delivery to a receiving processing module. The Update is in the style of an Errata

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt

2009-04-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:53:34 -0400 Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org wrote: This updates RFC 4871, DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures. Specifically the document clarifies the nature, roles and relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are candidates for payload

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt

2009-04-05 Thread Michael Thomas
Scott Kitterman wrote: I'll confess that my available mental bandwidth for this wg has been somewhat limited lately, but I hadn't considered that we were not doing a complete replacement of 4871. This is confusing enough without having to do mental gymastics between two RFCs to understand