On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:00:01 +0100, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Title : RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
-- Update
Author(s) : D. Crocker
Filename: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt
Pages : 12
This updates RFC 4871, DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures.
Specifically the document clarifies the nature, roles and
relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are
candidates for payload delivery to a receiving processing module.
The Update is in the style of an Errata
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:53:34 -0400 Barry Leiba barryle...@computer.org
wrote:
This updates RFC 4871, DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures.
Specifically the document clarifies the nature, roles and
relationship of the two DKIM identifier tag values that are
candidates for payload
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I'll confess that my available mental bandwidth for this wg has been
somewhat limited lately, but I hadn't considered that we were not doing a
complete replacement of 4871. This is confusing enough without having to do
mental gymastics between two RFCs to understand