[ietf-dkim] Intended status (was: Re: [dmarc-ietf] a slightly less kludge alternative to draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rcpts)

Hi, Murray, On 16-11-16 02:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: There's been a lot of great feedback here. I just cranked out an update based on the discussion so far: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kucherawy-dkim-rcpts-01 I forgot to update the title of Section 3, but other than that I t

Re: [ietf-dkim] Intended status (was: Re: [dmarc-ietf] a slightly less kludge alternative to draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rcpts)

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld < r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl> wrote: > Hi, Murray, > > On 16-11-16 02:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> There's been a lot of great feedback here. I just cranked out an update >> based on the discussion so far: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdi